Prediction of Lloyd Bourne vs Chris Pridham Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
L. Bourne vs C. Pridham

Lloyd Bourne

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Chris Pridham

CAN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Bourne 1 - 0 Pridham

They have played 3 sets in total, with Lloyd Bourne winning 2 and Chris Pridham winning 1. The last match between Lloyd Bourne and Chris Pridham was at the Seattle CH, 27-07-1987, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Lloyd Bourne getting the victory 3-6 7-6 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Bourne	1
Pridham	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(QF) Seattle CH(07-27-87)

Stats

Lloyd Bourne

Chris Pridham

L. Bourne vs C. Pridham H2H Profile

L. Bourne	Stats	C. Pridham
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
45.87% (100-118)	Career Total W/L	45.66% (79-94)
1	Hard	0
0	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

L. Bourne vs C. Pridham Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lloyd Bourne has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Chris Pridham has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lloyd Bourne, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chris Pridham has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Lloyd Bourne has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chris Pridham has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Lloyd Bourne has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Chris Pridham winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Lloyd Bourne has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 54% (W/L 30/26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 13/20). Chris Pridham has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 55/57), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/2).
Player level: In the last year, Lloyd Bourne has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Chris Pridham has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lloyd Bourne winning 1 times and Chris Pridham being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Lloyd Bourne winning 2 and Chris Pridham winning 1.
The last match between Lloyd Bourne and Chris Pridham was at the Seattle CH, 27-07-1987, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Lloyd Bourne getting the victory 3-6 7-6 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lloyd Bourne has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Chris Pridham has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lloyd Bourne has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chris Pridham has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Lloyd Bourne has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chris Pridham has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Lloyd Bourne vs Chris Pridham Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

L. Bourne vs C. Pridham H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

L. Bourne	Stats	C. Pridham
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
16	Games Won	16
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

L. Bourne Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
New Haven CH - 15-08-1988
R4 Brian GarrowB. Garrow	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
R3 Nuno MarquesN. Marques	W	7-6 6-4	Stats
Valkenswaard CH - 18-11-1987
QF Petr KordaP. Korda	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
R4 Andrei OlhovskiyA. Olhovskiy	W	6-3 1-6 7-6	Stats
R3 Tony MmohT. Mmoh	W	6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

C. Pridham Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Oahu - 03-01-1994
R1 Axel FinnbergA. Finnberg	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
Beijing - 18-10-1993
R1 Michael ChangM. Chang	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
Tokyo - 11-10-1993
R2 Mark WoodfordeM. Woodforde	L	6-7(10) 7-6(5) 6-0	Stats
R1 Kenny ThorneK. Thorne	W	7-6(7) 6-4	Stats
New Haven - 16-08-1993
R2 Mark KaplanM. Kaplan	L	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

L. Bourne vs C. Pridham Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

L. Bourne	Stats	C. Pridham
45.87% (100/118)	YTD Win/Loss	45.66% (79/94)
46.01% (254/298)	Sets Win/Loss	45.77% (200/237)
48.32% (2595/2776)	Games Win/Loss	49.30% (2127/2187)
46.08% (47/55)	Hard Win/Loss	49.11% (55/57)
39.39% (13/20)	Clay Win/Loss	38.46% (5/8)
37.04% (10/17)	Indoor Hard W/L	41.94% (13/18)
53.57% (30/26)	Grass Win/Loss	35.29% (6/11)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
554.64	Average Opponent Rank	0
39.29% (11/17)	Slam W/L	42.11% (8/11)
40.00% (4/6)	Masters W/L	42.86% (6/8)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	50.00% (3/3)
43.80% (53/68)	Main Tour W/L	41.05% (39/56)
54.24% (32/27)	Challenger W/L	60.53% (23/15)
47% (88/188)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	47% (67/143)
36% (10/28)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	41% (11/27)
0% (0/0)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	37% (11/30)
49% (36/74)	Deciding Set Win %	56% (30/54)
83% (101/84)	1st Set Won, Won Match	78% (74/58)
17% (101/17)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	20% (74/15)
12% (115/14)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (97/20)